Very interesting. I hope they win, and that similar suits are filed in other states. It wouldn't hurt to see some more action in Canada on this either, although there's already been significant action in Canada to move away from the sheltered workshop model.
I've Heard the Arguments for Keeping Sheltered Workshops
- Parents and caregivers like them because they give people with intellectual disabilities a place to go for the day.
- People who have been in sheltered workshops for a long time often like them because it is a place to go during the day where they can be with their peers, do some work and make a bit of money.
- It's an easy way to give people with intellectual disabilities some employment opportunities.
Those Arguments for Keeping Sheltered Workshops Don't Work for Me
- People with intellectual disabilities deserve more than a "place to go for the day". Agencies should not be providing baby-sitting services or warehousing facilities. As the article points out, that's going back to the days of institutions.
- If a person with disabilities wants to meet up with other friends who have disabilities, why come to a sheltered workshop to do it? Why not go for lunch or coffee, or visit someone at their home, like people without disabilities do?
- Why do a job in a sheltered workshop setting and not receive adequate compensation when a person with an intellectual disability can do the same job out in a community setting, get paid for the work, make new friends and have new experiences? Isn't money better spent on providing the support people need to obtain those kinds of employment opportunities?
Oregon Service Providers, Meet Me at Camera Three...
I know how you guys thought this was a best practice, but you've got to look at how you're coming across, and ask yourself if sheltered workshops are really the best way to meet the needs of the people you support.
Service providers are the ones supposed to be setting the good example for everyone else, by promoting the importance creation of opportunities for them to participate with dignity, equality, and full inclusion. What kind of message does it send to your communities when you, as service providers, keep them sequestered in buildings, without opportunity for interaction with the community, paying them less than minimum wage for jobs? What kind of message does it send to the people you support?
Think about it.